Mapping the Innovation Space Two: Individual Solutions Drives Infinite Disruptive Innovations
Editor | On 05, Sep 2004
By: Dr. John Cooney, Barry Winkless
Dr. John Cooney (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Barry Winkless Hdip, MSc (email@example.com)
Altran Technologies Ireland
This paper expounds the need for a new paradigm for innovation at the problem space. It suggests that innovation needs to move beyond standard practice towards individualistic solutions that exc eed consumer expectations.
Innovation as we know it is dead. It needs to move to another dimension in order to create benefit along the value chain. The emphasis has traditionally been placed on a project approach for example concept-plan-quality-makesell. Furthermore, innovation has largely operated within the â€œpast experiences comfort zoneâ€Ã“ due to psychological inertia. Moreover, â€œconformity factors â€ such as project success, customer, technical and financial performances have become the norm. While the importance of each factor is completely justified, they have enforced competing organisations to introduce product or service offerings for customers that are â€˜like but not likeâ€™ previous innovations. As a result Innovation is now best fit for â€œstandardizationâ€ and rapidly approaching what Peters (2003) calls â€˜Samenessâ€™. Here innovation reflects an age where the voice of the customer is seen as the Holy Grail. However, the reality is that the customer is not â€˜always rightâ€™. In fact many customers are not aware of what they want or indeed what will â€˜turn them onâ€™. Consequently there is a need to move beyond both the Kano paradigm of basic, performance and excitement needs and the concepts of WoW.
Evolution of the Customer
Just as art has evolved and developed from a one-dimensional world to a three dimensional cacophony so too has the customer canvas. We cannot any longer look upon markets as segments or categories. Fundamentally it is the â€˜group solutionâ€™ and â€˜group focused innovationâ€™ that causes discontent with product offerings. We are moving towards a new paradigm we are moving towards individual solutions, individual innovations. We are moving beyond customization. In essence we are moving towardsâ€¦â€¦â€¦
We have arrived at the age of â€˜Infinite Disruptive Innovationâ€™- where disruptive innovation at the problem space (Figure 1) is not the exception but the reality. Innovation is now more about embracing the standard deviations. The innovation space often lies outside â€˜the â€˜past experiences comfort zoneâ€™. In essence we are moving from normality to anomaly.
Lets link Infinite Design for You and Disruptive Innovation. In effect they can be considered as two sides of the same coin. By designing for the individual we create a personal infinite disruptive innovation. This results in the creation of â€˜Wham Bam What Was Thatâ€™Ã“ innovation solution. for numerous segments-
Design For You
Design For You (DFY) addresses issues in the Problem Space, outside of the â€˜past experiences comfort zoneâ€™. It is important to reiterate that the Problem Space is a need for innovation, a managerial or technical problem-simple or complex, or a perceived need for something to happen. Fundamentally DFYis comprised of Three elements and it is by creating â€˜Beyond Excitement- Wham Bamâ€™ in each of these elements that we create Infinite Disruptive Innovation in the problem space.
Careful manipulation of three elements (Figure)- func tion, design and benefit will allow the organisation to ensure that basic, performance and excitement expectations are met and superceded. Where the solution is individual, where the solution encapsulates Design For You principles.
Mapping the innovation space requires a different perspective and a different mindset. By focusing on the individual we can create Infinite Disruptive Innovations and we move towards a Design For You paradigm.
Peters, Tom (2003) â€˜Re-imagine- Business Excellence in a disruptive ageâ€™, Publishers: DK
Winkless, B and Cooney, J (2004) â€˜Mapping the Innovation Space One: Novel
Tools for Problem Definition in Product Innovationâ€™, July 2004, Triz Journal.