Glossary of TRIZ
Editor | On 25, Mar 2001
A shorter version of this paper first appeared in â€œIzobreteniaâ€ v.II, Autumn, 2000, the publication of the Altshuller Institute.
Â© 2001 The TRIZ Group, LLC
TRIZ is fast spreading in the technological world. Thousands of people become acquainted with TRIZ every year through various presentations, courses, seminars, and publications.
Often TRIZ materials developed by different authors contain terminology unique to a particular author and not used by others. This is mainly caused by variations in translation from Russian. This creates confusion among TRIZ novices, for they cannot always recognize the equivalency of different terms describing the same notion (compare, for example, synonyms “Engineering Contradiction”, “Technical Contradiction”, and “System Conflict” used by different authors).
Frequently, however, one can read articles that use the same names for different notions of TRIZ. For instance, the term “Patterns of Technological System Evolution” in some publications is equivalent to the term “Laws of Technological System Evolution”, and in other publications – to the term “Lines of Technological System Evolution”, although the latter two terms are not identical (the Laws define general directions of evolution, while the Lines specify particular stages of the evolution along these directions).
Use of a common professional lingo is the necessary condition for effective communication among the members of the global TRIZ community. The proposed glossary is the first attempt to develop such a lingo for English-speaking TRIZ practitioners.
The glossary is not by any means exhaustive; it contains mainly basic terms of TRIZ gleaned from various English-language literature source known to the author: books, university courses, conference papers and on-line articles. Assembling a comprehensive glossary of TRIZ that would adequately reflect the evolving body of knowledge this science will require contributions from many enthusiasts. The author will greatly appreciate any future help in improving this glossary.
The central analytical tool of TRIZ (ARIZ is a Russian abbreviation). Its basis is a sequence of logical procedures for analysis of a vaguely or ill-defined initial problem/situation and transforming it into a distinct System Conflict. Consideration of the System Conflict leads to the formulation of a Physical Contradiction whose elimination is provided by maximal utilization of the resources of the subject system. ARIZ puts together in a system most fundamental concepts and methods of TRIZ such as IdealTechnological System (Ideal System), System Conflict, Physical Contradiction, Substance-Field Analysis, Standards, and theLaws of Technological System Evolution.
See Conflict Matrix
Anticipatory Failure Determination
A TRIZ-based method for analysis and prevention of design failure modes.
A system consisting of two mono-systems.
A sufield of the type shown below:
Coefficient of convolution, Cc
A measure of the system’s Degree of Ideality â€“ a ratio of the number of sufields to the number of elements of these sufields (or a ratio of the number of functions to the number of sufield elements involved in the performance of these functions). For an elementary sufield, Cc = 1/3; for a chain sufield, Cc = 2/5; for a double sufield, Cc = 1/2.
A completely integrated bi– or poly-system performing two or more functions. In such systems, sub-systems responsible for individual functions are merged into a substance; their separation is impossible without disintegrating the whole system (e.g., in photochromic reading glasses, two functions – eyesight enhancement and shielding sun lights – are performed by one substance of the lens material).
Compound (complex) sufield
A sufield of the type shown below:
See Conflict Domain
Conflict Domain (Operation Zone, Conflict Area)
Conflict Matrix (Contradiction Matrix, Altshullerâ€™s Matrix)
System’s components involved in a SystemConflict.
Convolution (Integration, Trimming, Pruning)
Degree of Ideality
A measure of the system’s ideality usually expressed as the ratio of the system’s
functionality over the system’s cost:
A sufield of the type shown below:
Result of interaction of fields and substances. An individual effect can be modeled as follows:
See System Conflict
See System Conflict
Immediate physical surroundings of a technological system or of its part.
The energy needed for interaction of two substances. In addition to four fundamental fields – electromagnetic, gravitational, and nuclear fields of weak and strong interactions – TRIZ deals with engineering fields, such as mechanical, thermal, electric, magnetic, and chemical. These fields manifest themselves through many groups of physical and chemical phenomena.
Generic Principles for Overcoming Physical Contradictions
Ideal Final Result
An ideal solution of an engineering design problem based on the notion of Ideal Technological System.
A system that is absent as a physical entity, but that fully perfoms the prescribed function.
A sufield containing fewer than three elements.
Original problem statement, usually a cluster of various problems.
There are 50 typical techniques (operators) for overcoming System Conflicts; many of them may contain a few sub-techniques.
A system whose sub-systems have opposite properties.
Knowledge Base of Engineering Applications of Physical, Chemical and Geometric Effects
A set of physical, chemical and geometric effects arranged by a functional principle.
Law of Completeness
This law states that an autonomous technological system must include four minimally functioning principal parts: an engine, a transmission, a working means, and a control means.
Law of Elimination of Human Involvement
This law states that technological systems evolve in the direction of delegation functions performed by humans to technological systems.
Laws of Engineering System Evolution
Law of Harmonization
This law states that the necessary condition for existence of an effective technological system is coordination of periodicity of actions (or natural frequencies) of its parts.
Law of Increasing Controllability
This law states that technological systems evolve in the direction of increased controllability of their components; this is often achieved by transition from elementary sufields to double and chain sufields.
Law of Increasing Degree of Ideality
The primary law of evolution of technological systems. It states that technological systems evolve in the direction of increasing their Degree of Ideality.
Law of Increasing Flexibility (Law of Increasing Dynamism)
This law states that technological systems evolve in the direction toward more flexible structures capable of adaptation to changing environmental conditions (multi-functionality) and to varying performance regimes.
Law of Shortening of Energy Flow Path
This law states that technological systems evolve in the direction of shortening of energy passage through the system (from the engine to the working means).
Laws of Technological System Evolution (Laws of Engineering System Evolution, Patterns of Technological System Evolution, Trends of Technological System Evolution)
The Laws reflect significant, stable, and repeatable interactions betweenelements of technological systems and between the systems and their environments in the process of evolution.
Law of Transition to a Higher-Level System (Law of Transition to a Supersystem)
Law of Transition to a Micro-Level
This law states that technological systems evolve in the general direction of fragmentation of their components (first of all, fragmentation of working means).
Level of Invention
A qualitative measure of the degree of novelty of an invention.
Lines of Evolution
The Lines identify specific stages of evolution associated with particular Laws of
Technological System Evolution.
Macro Physical Contradiction
A problem associated with major modifications of a system, i.e., with changing its physical principle of functioning.
Micro Physical Contradiction
Minimal technological system
A problem formulated according to the rule: â€œThe system remains unchanged or even simplifies, but the harmful effect disappears, or a useful effect is obtained.â€ When solving a mini-problem, the physical principle of the systemâ€™s functioning is not changed.
A system performing one function.
Object (Article, Product)
A component of the system that is to be controlled (processed, modified, e.g., moved, machined, bent, turned, heated, expanded, charged, illuminated, measured, detected, etc.).
See Conflict Domain
Partially convoluted bi(poly)-system
A physical mechanism that enables performance of a specific function. For example, a function “cleaning a chemical solution from contaminantsâ€ may be based on such diverse physical actions as “moving the contaminants away from the solution”, or “disintegration of the contaminants”, and others.
A situation when the same component must satisfy mutually exclusive demands to its physical state, e.g., be hot and cold, electrically conductive and insulative, etc.
A system consisting of more than two mono-systems.
The main purpose of existence of a technological system.
Predilection toward conventional ways to analyze and solve problems.
Substances, fields and other attributes of a technological system (e.g., time of functioning, occupied space, etc.) as well as of its environment and of an overall system that can be utilized to improve the system.
Evolution of technological systems can be illustrated by an S-shaped curve reflecting changes of the system’s main performance characteristics (or its benefit-to-cost ratio, Degree of Ideality) with time since its inception.
The approaches to resolving Physical Contradictions: Separation of opposite properties in space, separation of opposite properties in time, separation of opposite properties between a system and its components.
Standard Approaches to Solving Problems (Standard Solutions, Standard Techniques, Standards)
Substance-Field (Sufield) Analysis
A branch of TRIZ studying transformation and evolution of sufield structures.
An unexpected benefit of invention.
Supersystem (Higher-level system)
System that includes the system under consideration as a sub-system.
System Conflict (Engineering Contradiction, Technical Contradiction)
An interaction between system’s parts when the useful function/action causes simultaneously a harmful effect, or introduction (intensification) of the useful function/action, or elimination or reduction of the harmful function/action causes deterioration or unacceptable complication of one of the parts or of the whole system.
Technology assessment curves (Altshuller metrics)
These curves (“Number of inventions vs. Time”, “Level of inventions vs. Time”, “Profitability of inventions vs. Time”) are used to define the position of the systemon its S-curve.
A component having direct physical interaction with an object (i.e., controlling the object).
Tool-Object-Product (TOP) Analysis
A techniques for linking Functional and Substance-Field Analyses.
Trends of Technological System Evolution
TRIZ Technology Forecasting (Directed Evolution, Guided Technology Evolution)
A systematic TRIZ approach to conceptual development of next-generation products and processes.
Typical System Conflicts (Typical Engineering Contradictions, Typical Technical Contradictions)
Despite immense diversity of technological systems, there is a finite number of typical System Conflicts such as productivity vs. accuracy, reliability vs. complexity, shape vs. speed, etc. These System Conflicts can usually be resolved by application of the Inventive Principles
Typical Techniques for Overcoming System Conflicts
Void is a discontinuity in a substance. Void is an exceptional resource, for it is always available, extremely cheap and can be easily mixed with other resources, forming, for instance, hollow and porous structures, foam, bubbles, etc.
Altshuller, G.S., And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA, 1997.
Altshuller, G.S., Creativity as an Exact Science, Gordon and Breach, N.Y., N.Y., 1988.
Altshuller, G.S., The Innovation Algorithm, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA, 1999.
Altshuller, G.S., 40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Technical Innovation, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester, MA, 1999.
Fey V., Rivin E., The Science of Innovation: A Managerial Overview of the TRIZ Methodology, The TRIZ Group, MI, 1997.
Fey V., Rivin E., Fundamentals of TRIZ, Course Book, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 2001.
Salamatov Y., TRIZ: The Right Solution at the Right Time, Insytec, The Netherlands, 1999.
Terninko, J., Zlotin, B., Zusman, A., Systematic Innovation: An Introduction to TRIZ, Responsible Management, NH, 1997.
Ideation International, Inc., http://www.ideationtriz.com
Invention Machine Corporation, http://www.invention-machine.com
TRIZ Consulting, Inc., http://www.trizconsulting.com
The TRIZ Journal, https://the-trizjournal.com
The TRIZ Group, LLC, http://www.trizgroup.com